November 23, 2017

Another two proposed coal power plants taken to court

Electricity connection. Photo/ Courtesy of Construction Review

The company groundWork, represented by the Centre for Environmental Rights, has instituted two new court applications in the Pretoria High Court against proposed coal power plants.

Environmental justice organisation groundWork, represented by the Centre for Environmental Rights, has instituted two new court applications in the Pretoria High Court against the Minister of Environmental Affairs and others, challenging the decisions of the Minister and the Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) to authorise proposed independent power producer (IPP) KiPower and Khanyisa coal-fired power stations, without a full assessment of the plants’ climate change impacts.

Both power stations would be based in the Mpumalanga Highveld – declared an air quality priority area a decade ago because of the poor air quality.

The Highveld is home to 12 existing Eskom coal-fired power stations, which together with numerous other polluting mines and industry in the area, result in significant air pollution and non-compliance with health-based  ambient air quality standards.

Khanyisa and KiPower would also both have significant impacts on the Upper Olifants River Catchment, which is already stressed, mainly due to impacts of existing mines and industry in the area.

Earlier this year, the Thabametsi IPP power station planned for Limpopo was challenged in court for its failure to consider climate change impacts.

In that case, the North Gauteng High Court confirmed that there is a legal obligation for the Minister and DEA to ensure that a climate change impact assessment for projects like coal-fired power stations – which are likely to have substantial climate impacts – is conducted before giving approval.

Neither KiPower nor Khanyisa’s environmental impact assessments (EIAs) contained a comprehensive assessment of the climate change impacts that the plants will have, such as an assessment of indirect and lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for the plants, or how the surrounding areas and the plants’ own resilience will be impacted by climate change if the plants go ahead.

Both EIAs identify that there are no economically feasible options to mitigate the plants’ GHG emissions. Both KiPower and Khanyisa – given the technology that they propose using – are anticipated to be significant GHG emitters, as Thabametsi’s climate change impact assessment has shown.

The 600 MW KiPower power station, proposed to be based near Delmas, is to be developed by companies Kuyasa Mining and KiPower.

KiPower did not submit a bid under the first bid window of the Coal IPP Procurement Programme.  However, the company has indicated its intention to bid under the next bid window, when (and if) announced.

Kuyasa has indicated that the plant might even proceed outside of this Procurement Programme.

The Khanyisa project is also a proposed 600 MW coal plant, which would be based near eMalaheni.

It is to be developed by the company ACWA Power Khanyisa Thermal Power Station RF – linked to the Saudi Arabian ACWA Power.

Unlike KiPower, Khanyisa is already a successful bidder (along with the Thabametsi power station), appointed under the first bid window of the Coal Baseload IPP Procurement Programme.

Both Thabametsi and Khanyisa are required (under the Coal Baseload IPP Programme requirements) to reach financial close before the end of the year and to commence operating by no later than December 2021.

Both of them, however, have numerous licences outstanding.

They also cannot reach financial close if there are pending legal disputes in relation to their environmental authorisations.

 

Related posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.