Perhaps because of its historical significance, and the recent commodity cycle boom, there are many contentious issues affecting the mining industry that remain unresolved.
The Mining Charter is perhaps chief among these. Its implementation has been suspended pending a court challenge, where the Chamber of Mines, representing our country’s mineral producers, believes Mineral Resources Minister, Mosebenzi Zwane, overstepped his authority in imposing new charter terms at the last minute in the face of objections from the industry, and with little consultation.
After two years of work on the new charter, with the case now in the courts and no engagement between the chamber and government, it is fair to say that the relationship between the minister and the industry has broken down.
Aside from the Mining Charter, the industry remains extremely heavily regulated. There are onerous – and contentious – regulations governing exploration permits; mining authorisations; tax; royalties; labour relations; health and safety; community relations; environmental issues; as well as rehabilitation.
Many of these issues are currently mired in disputes and legal challenges that waste the time and resources of the mining sector as well as government.
While a document like the Mining Charter is meant to resolve disagreement and map a way forward, it has in fact polarised stakeholders.
There is an urgent need for a fresh start on mining, with an eye to securing a new deal for the sector. What we need is a political solution, not an adversarial legal one.
One approach might be for a new player, with enough cachet in government, business and labour to broker a deal. One could identify the main points of disagreement, then establish an inter-ministerial task team with the power to call a moratorium on legal challenges and try to negotiate.
The obvious candidate to do this is deputy president, Cyril Ramaphosa. He has the respect of business and knowledge of the industry from almost a decade leading the National Union of Mineworkers.
Ramaphosa has also expressed sentiments along these lines. He wrote in Business Day of the need for, “a new deal capable of unleashing the country’s competitive and entrepreneurial energies”.
During the World Economic Forum annual meeting in Davos, he said that, “The Mining Charter is going to be thoroughly discussed with key role players so that we find a solution that will unlock our mining… If the Mining Charter is holding us back, then we must deal with it and find commonality of purpose and views with potential investors.”
These encouraging words point to a renewed urge to find pragmatic solutions in the broader social interest. It would be great to see someone in government championing this approach, and it seems the deputy president himself could be that person. I would not be the first person to suggest this.
Such a political resolution is not without precedent. The silicosis case brought by thousands of miners against South African gold mines also seems to have been solved by negotiation. That case was headed for the Constitutional Court. Fortunately, the parties are close to reaching an out-of-court settlement and the case has been postponed until further notice.
Narrow political or populist agendas need to be put aside. Pragmatism is required to overcome the legal stasis that we find ourselves in – and the silicosis cases shows this is possible.